Climate Action
Not in My Backyard, Thank You!
July 24, 2024
In the small town of Moscow, Maine, residents voted last December to ban large-scale commercial solar farms, citing concerns about land use and environmental health. Along the Jersey Shore, opposition and a lawsuit have erupted over proposed offshore wind farms, with locals worried about potential impacts on their economy and marine life. In Texas, a state increasingly synonymous with wind energy success, where wind farms have become a significant economic driver for many rural areas, some officials are pushing back. Railroad Commissioner Wayne Christian, for instance, has publicly opposed offshore wind projects, labeling them a “taxpayer boondoggle”.
As we navigate this crucial transition away from fossil fuel energy towards renewable energy, it’s clear that the challenge isn’t just technological – it’s deeply social. Bridging the gap between global climate needs and community concerns is becoming increasingly vital.
By examining both success stories and areas of resistance, we can try to work towards renewable energy projects that not only power our future, but also resonate with and benefit local communities.
Are Property Values Really Affected By Clean Energy?
Residents often worry about the impact of renewable energy installations on property values, and research by the Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory has addressed these concerns.
They discovered that for solar farms, an analysis of millions of home sales across six U.S. states showed houses within a half-mile of a solar farm did see an average 1.5% decrease in resale value. Homes further than a mile away showed no significant statistical difference.
For wind projects, a study of over 500,000 home sales found that in populated areas, houses within one mile of turbines experienced temporary price drops of an average 11% compared to homes three to five miles away, with prices typically recovering within only a few years of operation.
While renewable energy projects can have these negative local property price impacts, research suggests these are often smaller and more temporary than feared. These effects can be further reduced through proper planning, community education, and community involvement throughout the project timeline.
Environmental and Wildlife Concerns
Environmental concerns, particularly about wildlife, must also be considered. Wind turbines have faced criticism for causing bird deaths, with one study estimating they kill up to 340,000 birds annually in the US alone. Other studies have numbers hovering closer to 600,000. While this is significant, it is worth noting that domesticated cats are estimated to kill just under one million wild birds a year in the US.
Conservationists, in response to the turbine issue, are developing solutions to mitigate these bird death numbers. Strategies such as avoiding turbine placement in critical habitats or migration routes can help reduce bird fatalities. Additionally, painting one turbine blade black to enhance visibility has been shown to reduce bird fatalities by over 70%.
Economic and Land Use Impacts
In 2022, wind turbines in all 50 U.S. states produced more than 10% of the country’s total electricity and added $20 billion to the U.S. economy. It’s clear that renewable energy projects can bring significant economic benefits to local communities.
In Texas for example, wind farms have become a crucial source of tax revenue for some rural counties. Over its lifetime, one 100 MW (megawatt) wind turbine could contribute from $16 million to over $20 million in tax revenue for local budgets to utilize. Money that can go towards funding essential public services and infrastructure upgrades for the community.
However, concerns about renewable energy projects consuming agricultural land are valid. While wind turbines taking up farmland may be a harder issue to fix, innovative approaches do exist for solar energy. “Agrivoltaic” systems, combine solar energy with agriculture by growing crops underneath solar panels, and these systems have shown promise.
A 2022 study in Science Direct found that this method of ‘co-production’ can increase land use efficiency by up to 29%. For example, Kenya adopted their first agrivoltaics system to generate electricity and grow crops on the same land. The shade from the panels protects vegetables from heat stress and water loss, allowing rural farmers to grow a wide range of crops while also harvesting solar energy, effectively utilizing the sun’s power twice.
Additionally, research shows that Denmark’s offshore wind farms and the boulders used to protect turbine bases can act as artificial reefs, attracting marine life and shielding areas from large-scale fishing, mitigating some environmental concerns associated with offshore wind development.
The Power of Community Engagement
The importance of community involvement in renewable energy projects cannot be overstated. Projects that actively engage local residents and address their concerns tend to be more successful and widely accepted. Denis Hayes, one of Earth Day’s founding members, recently emphasized this point in EARTHDAY.ORG’s gala speech:
When people change their behavior to reflect shared values, they become far more likely to join together in collective actions.
dennis hayes, earthday.org
Denmark exemplifies this approach with its community ownership model for wind projects. Since 2009, Danish law has required new renewable projects to offer at least 20% ownership to local residents. This policy has contributed to Denmark’s remarkable success in wind power generation. As of 2021, wind and solar power accounted for half of Denmark’s electricity consumption, one of the highest percentages worldwide. This support shows how involving communities in renewable energy projects can benefit local residents and give them a stake in these developments.
A People-Driven Future
While concerns about renewable energy projects are understandable, examining the evidence can help communities make informed decisions. Property values don’t plummet permanently near renewable energy installations, environmental and land use impacts can be managed and mitigated, and the economic benefits to local communities can be substantial.
However, it’s crucial to approach these types of projects with sensitivity to local concerns and a real commitment to community engagement. By fostering open dialogue, considering community needs, and making decisions based on facts, we can find ways to implement renewable energy solutions that benefit both local communities and the broader environment.
Through understanding, collaboration, and evidence-based decision-making, we can create a cleaner energy future that works for everyone.
